New Tax Law Soon Ends Alimony Deduction

The Tax Cuts and Job Act of 2017 effects a change to the tax treatment of alimony that is noteworthy for those considering divorce. We recently read an article regarding the topic in the Hartford Courant written by Eric Higgins, an attorney we know well and respect. His article is clear and concise and particularly pertinent to Connecticut. He has given us his permission to share it.

End of Alimony Deduction Hits Connecticut Couples

By Eric M. Higgins
Hartford Courant, February 4, 2018

After 75 years, the so-called alimony deduction will soon be dead, a casualty of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, the sweeping tax legislation that President Donald Trump signed on Dec. 22.

The repeal of the alimony deduction threatens to affect Connecticut residents more severely than those of any other state. Before the bill was signed, the alimony deduction treated alimony as taxable income to the recipient and tax deductible by the payer. The repeal means that the tax treatment of alimony payments will be reversed. For the recipient, alimony payments will no longer be taxable income. For the payer, the payments will no longer be tax deductible. The bottom line is more money for Uncle Sam; less for the divorced couple.

If you already are divorced or will become divorced this year, there is no cause for alarm. The repeal applies only to divorce decrees issued on or after Jan. 1, 2019. Existing alimony orders and those that will take effect this year are grandfathered. Modifications of pre-2019 alimony orders also will be grandfathered, so that a modified order will enjoy the same tax treatment as the prior alimony order unless the court orders or the parties agree otherwise. These rules apply to temporary as well as final alimony orders.

For those divorcing in 2019 and later, the repeal of the alimony deduction will magnify the financial stress caused by divorce, and will hurt both the payer and the recipient. The reason is that the deduction enables a divorced couple to shift income from the typically higher tax rate of the payer to the typically lower tax rate of the recipient. This reduces the combined income tax paid by the parties, and correspondingly increases the after-tax income available for division between the divorcing spouses. The repeal of the deduction will reduce the total after-tax income available to divide between the couple. It will hurt them both.

The impact can be significant. For example, based on the 2018 IRS tax tables, for a Connecticut couple with a husband earning $250,000 per year and a wife who is a stay-at-home mother with no income, the repeal of the alimony deduction can increase the couple’s combined income tax burden by more than $15,000 (assuming no other income, exemptions or deductions). That is a lot of money that no longer will be available for either spouse.

A recent survey of matrimonial law attorneys throughout the country by J. Thomas Oldham, professor of law at the University of Houston Law School, indicates that alimony awards in Connecticut may be the highest in the United States. The survey also indicates that Connecticut may have the longest alimony terms — that is, the number of years alimony is paid — in the nation. So, the repeal of the alimony deduction will likely hit Connecticut residents especially hard.

The repeal is likely to have another consequence: the loss of the current tax deduction for legal fees and court costs paid to obtain an award of alimony. Previously, legal fees and costs incurred in seeking alimony were tax deductible, subject to a cap of 2 percent of adjusted gross income. The rationale for the deduction was that these legal fees and costs were a necessary cost of obtaining taxable income. Once the elimination of the alimony deduction becomes effective, alimony no longer will be taxable income to the recipient. Therefore, alimony recipients likely will lose the ability to deduct legal fees and costs incurred in connection with securing an award of alimony.

Divorce frequently results in financial pain and a decrease in the standard of living for both parties, who must support two households on the same income that previously supported one. The repeal of the alimony deduction will exacerbate this problem by reducing the after-tax income available to pay alimony. If, as Professor Oldham’s survey suggests, Connecticut has among the highest alimony awards and the longest alimony terms in the nation, the effect of the repeal in Connecticut will be pronounced.

To read the original article, click here.

More Implications of the New Law

Since alimony will no longer be taxable to the lower-earner spouse, it will also no longer be considered compensation for the purposes of making IRA contributions. As such, a non-working ex-spouse misses out on the opportunity to contribute to a retirement account post-divorce. Presumably, retirement assets will be divided, so the non-working ex-spouse will have other retirement assets, but depending on their age at the time of divorce, this inability to contribute could be meaningful.

The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the elimination of the alimony deduction will produce an additional $6.9 billion for the government over the next ten years. Interestingly, the IRS has found that in one recent tax year over 300,000 taxpayers claimed paying alimony while only half that claimed having received it- sometimes known as the alimony gap! The IRS will be closely monitoring this “gap” and it is recommended that ex-spouse verify that the amount of alimony paid and received matches.

There will be additional ramifications of alimony no longer being deductible. It is likely the states will have to adjust their child support and alimony tables and procedures. It may be that alimony will be used less as high income spouses will opt to focus more on the division of investment accounts and other property to equalize settlements.

Time will tell if 2018 ends up as frantic year for divorce attorneys, but for divorcing couples where one spouse’s tax bracket is higher than the others and alimony is being considered, finalizing the divorce in 2018 is worth seriously pursuing.

Jennifer Nicasio, CFP®
Jennifer joined HTG in 2005. As an advisor, she helps clients make thoughtful and informed decisions on all aspects of their finances. Jennifer is a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ practitioner and Certified Divorce Financial Analyst®. As a CDFA™ professional, she helps clients understand the short and long-term implications of decisions they are making during the divorce process. Jennifer has a BA from Middlebury College.
The information provided is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security. It does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status or investment horizon. You should consult your attorney or tax advisor.
Receive our latest features, news and helpful advice